Before the external party sees a single word, your contract passes through your own team: a draft is written, comments attach directly to the clauses, notes are discussed in one thread, and versions are saved in full — and at the end, explicit management approval. Nothing goes out before it is approved, and every change has an owner and a date.
The first party undertakes to supply the agreed quantities for a total value of million EGPM Payable in three instalments in accordance with the schedule attached to this contract.
Delivered within Thirty daysQ from the effective date, and the first party bears Transport and insurance liabilityA all the way to the second party's premises.
This amount in figures and words? We add “only”.
@Ahmed The delivery time is tight for the supplier — shall we revisit it?
We prefer the deposit to be split equally between the two parties.
Approved it after the change
Internal review is not a formality — it is the first line of defence for your legal reputation. A missing clause or an ambiguous phrase shows up during a dispute, not at signing, and by then it is too late. That is why Wthaiq brings the whole review cycle into one place: The specialist writes the draft, A colleague comments on the same clause, The thread is discussed internally and externally, andThe manager approves — and all of it is kept in a version history showing who changed what, before anything goes out.
Highlight any sentence and comment on it directly — the comment stays stuck to the clause itself however far the text moves, so nobody is left wondering which paragraph was meant.
Every save creates a new version with its author and time. Go back to any earlier version, or compare two versions and see exactly what changed between them — no ambiguity.
Set the approval chain: first reviewer, then manager, then final sign-off. The contract does not move to the next step without explicit approval from the person who owns that role.
Each member sees and acts only within their role: drafter, reviewer, approver or viewer. Permissions are enforced at server level — not for show.
Your internal comments stay between you and your team, and external notes for the other party are kept entirely separate. Nobody sees your internal discussion by accident.
As long as the contract is under review, the external send button is locked. The moment the final approval lands, the contract locks against editing and stays ready to sign with confidence.
The specialist writes the contract from a template or from scratch and prepares it in full — the first version is recorded in the log automatically.
Highlight clauses, write your comments, tag colleagues with a mention, and discuss in a single thread — internally and externally.
Once the draft is ready, the manager reviews the whole thing and approves it with one click — or sends it back with a clear reason.
Once final approval is given, the contract locks and goes out for authenticated electronic signature by its external parties.
Set who approves and when — the contract moves along the path step by step, and never moves forward without explicit approval from the holder of each role.
Law firms and legal departments that draft clients' contracts, where every clause carries weight. Collective review and approval before delivery protect the quality of the output and the firm's own liability.
Companies with an explicit policy: no contract leaves without the line manager's or the legal department's approval. The approval chain applies that policy automatically to every contract.
Large deals, partnerships and confidentiality agreements where any mistake is costly. Put more than one pair of eyes on the review, and record every comment and decision — so you are fully covered.
Instead of writing your notes in a separate email or message and trying to describe «the third clause on the second page», you highlight the sentence itself inside the contract and comment on it directly. The comment is anchored to the highlighted text and stays attached to it even if it moves after an edit. You can flag any colleague with an @mention so they get a notification. You can open a discussion thread under the clause. And you close the comment as soon as the point is dealt with, so it moves into an archive instead of cluttering the page. The result: every note exactly where it belongs, and nobody lost in «which paragraph do you mean?».
Version history is the contract's complete memory. With every substantive save, Wthaiq captures a new version recorded with the name of whoever made it and the exact time, so you can go back to any earlier state of the contract with one click. More important still: you can compare two versions side by side and see clearly what was removed, what was added, and what was changed — without rereading the whole contract from the beginning. That makes accountability easy («who changed the value clause?») and protects you if an unintended edit slips through, because the original version is always there and always recoverable.
Multi-level approval means you define an ordered approval chain before the contract goes out: a legal reviewer first, for example, then the department manager, then final approval from the account owner. The contract moves through the chain step by step — each level has to approve before it passes to the next, and any level can send the contract back with a note explaining why if a change is needed. No step can be skipped, and nothing goes out externally while the chain is incomplete. Every approval or return is recorded with its author and its time in the contract log, so you have complete, documented governance over every decision.
A draft under review is visible to your internal team only, and is governed by roles and permissions. Anyone you give a «reviewer» or «approver» role can open the contract, comment, and approve according to their permission, while a viewer can only look, not edit. The external party sees nothing of the draft or of your internal discussion at all — they enter the picture only after final approval, when the contract goes out for signature, and at that point they see the approved version alone. If you enable external comments, they can add their notes in a separate thread clearly marked «external», without seeing any internal comment between you and your team.
Absolutely not — internal comments stay within your team and the external party never sees them. External notes live in a clearly separate thread, and the other party only enters the picture after final approval, when the contract goes out for signature.
Yes — every substantive save creates a version recorded with its author and its time. You can restore any earlier version in one click, or compare two versions to see exactly what changed between them before you decide.
The roles you grant approval rights to — usually the manager or the account owner. You can set up a multi-level approval chain, so the contract passes through more than one approver in order before it is locked and goes out.
The contract goes back to whoever drafted it with an instant notification carrying the reason for the return, so they amend it accordingly and resubmit it for review. The cycle is corrective, not punitive, and every return and approval is recorded with its author and its time in the contract's log.
After final approval the contract is locked against editing and becomes ready to send — and that is the point. If a change is needed, whoever holds approval rights can revert the contract’s status and reopen the cycle, and that is clearly recorded in the log.
Yes — whether you started from a ready contract in the library or wrote a custom contract from scratch, you can put it through the internal review cycle before sending. And once approved, both continue along the same signing and authentication path.
Turn on internal review for your team — review, comment and approve, before any external party sees it.
Start the review now